[Home] [About Us] [Bios & Publications] [EFP in the News] [Presentations] [Upcoming Speeches] [Monthly Columns] [Contact Us]
COMPANIES & FINANCE UK: The meaning of Liffe, the futures, the universe, et cetera: London's biggest derivatives exchange is to launch a product that will put it at the cutting edge of the futures market - though investor appetite remains unclear
Financial Times Jan 20, 2001
There is often an important psychological turning point in sport when a team that has been defending for much of the match suddenly attacks. Something like this will happen on Monday week at Liffe, Britain's biggest derivatives exchange, as it launches a potentially important product with all the razzmatazz it can muster.
For
much of the past three years Liffe - the London International Financial Futures
and Options Exchange - has had its back to the wall as rivals tried to snatch
business and it has negotiated a tricky transition from old-fashioned floor
trading to a modern screen-based system.
At
one point, its very survival was in doubt. Now, thanks in great measure to the
leadership of Brian Williamson, chairman, it is on the offensive again.
The
change will be underscored by the start of trading in so-called Universal Stock
Futures on January 29. These allow investors to take out futures contracts on
single stocks - initially, 25 of the largest companies in the US and Europe,
such as Cisco Systems, Vodafone and Deutsche Bank.
Liffe
is the first with a single market for blue chips from around the world. It also
offers the simplicity of a single set of rules and one central counterparty.
The
equity futures market has been dominated by products based on the collective
constituents of indices, such as the FTSE 100, that allow investors to hedge
their risks in broadly-based portfolios. Single stock futures are similar: an
easy, financially efficient and low-cost way of taking a position in an
individual company while avoiding the hassle of buying the underlying shares.
They are a simpler, purer way of hedging than the existing market in individual
company options and do not attract their contract premiums.
It
seems an obvious idea, so why has it not taken off before? One reason is that it
has been banned in the US, that cradle of financial innovation, though this is
changing. Another is that it is not well suited to floor-based trading.
Computers,
however, can handle the number-crunching and Liffe should have an advantage
since its new Connect platform - now better behaved after some embarrassing
glitches - allows screen-based trading worldwide. Eurex, the only rival with a
global reach, seems unenthusiastic about single stock futures.
There
is also a question-mark over the market's enthusiasm for the product. Some
suspect it will get a lukewarm reception, with conservative fund managers
reluctant to place big bets on single companies. Certainly, turnover in other
pioneering markets has not been exciting.
Liffe
itself reports such good feedback that it has upped its original list of 15
stocks to 25. And it is hardly alone in its enthusiasm. The Chicago Board
Options Exchange is keen to get into stock futures when the law permits. Indeed,
a worry for Liffe must be that the record of protective US regulators suggests
they may prevent it offering its products there until domestic competition is
ready. That is one reason I suspect the contracts will take time to gain decent
volume. But provided Liffe executes well, its contracts ought to be winners.
Richard
Sandor, a leading figure in the Chicago
industry (and recent addition to the Liffe board), points out that interest rate
derivatives dominated the past two decades of the 20th century because of
concern about debt and inflation.
The
surge in equity values during the long US bull market has led to the market
capitalisation of just two companies - Cisco and Microsoft - being greater than
the US government's entire long bond issuance in the 1990s. "The planet's
debt-to-equity ratio has changed," he says, and the need to hedge
individual stocks will leap dramatically.